Sunday, December 7, 2008

9-table chart rivaling BCG's linearity



You all know that I am envious of BCG's chart. Finally, I found one of mine that resembles it, but it is only for 2hrs of play. It was for 1000 hands though, which equates to about 30 hours of casino play.

I was a beneficiary of positive variance with quads 3 times last night in 500 hands. All up it only added to $14 in winnings, one player and 2 short-stackers. Can't recall any badbeats, but I don't even get to learn the result of a lot of hands. I just get prompted for actions, others folding just moves quickly to the next hand before I realise.

It's a different way of playing poker. I'll try for another session tonight. Next post will be regarding 12+ hours of live play yesterday.

2 comments:

PHLUKKE said...

I have tried playing 14 tables . It was a real buzz , but alas a complete disaster . If you can make it work I shall be incredibly jealous . I'd kill to be supernova (elite) and the only way to achieve it is by multi-tabling . 3 seems to be my optimum number . sigh. regards . L4

TiocfaidhArLa said...

For the record, I was interested in comparing stats over both like sessions ... they were:

DAY 1 : VPIP = 22.4%, WTSD = 6.5%, Steal = 43.2%, AFT 1.6.

DAY 2 : VPIP = 23.6%, WTSD = 6.5%, Steal = 30.0%, AFT 1.5.

Pretty consistent apart from stealing stats. I wonder if I was sub-consciously afraid of attracting too much attention with my 3 quads?