Thursday, November 6, 2008

Pocket Rockets Live in Brisbane, what would you do?

I had 90 minutes to kill before heading to the airport after a day's business in Brisbane. I headed to the casino where they had about 8 tables, I think - 5 were active. The lowest limit was a NL100-NL250 BI with 2.50/5.00 blinds.

My table seemed to be full of regulars and a few poker-savvy backpacker types. I bought in for the minimum as I wouldn't have time to get a read and didn't want pushed off a good marginal hand for a 250 stack. 100, I'll coin flip (worst case) for stacks.

I ended up the session +$36 with relative ease. Had great p/f hands but missed all flops. Stole blinds once, c-bet once, folded all others. The other interesting hand, I'd like comments on.

The 4 players to my left were all LAG. 4 to my right were a mix of TAG and T/P. 20 hands into the session I was dealt AA. UTG limped for $5, I knew that I'd be raised, so I limped. Next player had just sat down and min-raised. one caller, BB called, UTG called so there is $45 in the pot and I have $95 more in front of me. Everyone has me covered.

What would you do?

3 comments:

The blindman said...

Limp-reraise screams aces, but if you just win the $45 there you've done ok.

You're at least a 4-1 favourite against any hand that is likely to call you. You need to raise at least enough so a caller doesn't have implied odds against you (140 against the amount of your raise). You would also prefer at most one or two callers. I go for around a $40 raise, intending to shove the remaining $50 on virtually any flop. An immediate shove is probably also fine with $45 in the pot, but I reckon there is some postflop equity lost that way.

TiocfaidhArLa said...

The table had been calling $50 bets routinely.

I reckoned that if I put in a pot-sized raise that I was getting committed anyway and didn't want multi-way on a scary board, especially paired.

I decided to shove and be happy either way, call or not. Everyone folded and I was happy - even though I shouldn't have been.

In retrospect, a pot-sized bet would have been a better play, I think, regardless of outcome.

With a limited time in a strange casino, the low variance play sits just fine with me psychologically though.

As always, the Blindman was spot on.

The blindman said...

In terms of pure EV, the more players call your $50 bet the better (especially since they will be virtually committed for the rest of their chips). With AA you have >50% equity even against four opponents with random cards (and your equity is probably even better against hands that are likely to call a big PF bet).